The smart Trick of h4831sc load data That No One is Discussing
The smart Trick of h4831sc load data That No One is Discussing
Blog Article
Nevertheless IMR 4831 and H4831SC are distinctive powders, you'll find that in many instances, the place one of them is outlined one other are going to be at the same time. Also, you will discover there is a reasonably regular partnership involving them with reference to stated loads.
Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Physically, it has a shorter grain size, hence, the designation SC or small Reduce. The shorter, more compact kernels allow the powder to movement through the powder steps more smoothly, assisting to ease the continual reducing of granules.
4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I discovered this combo produces .5MOA groups with velocity about 3020fps out of a 26" barrel. I exploit this exact same powder in my 300wm taking pictures 180gr pills, so It really is nice to obtain just one powder for both equally.
Caution working with SC or SSC designed loads with long cut, back off and operate up. Use Protected loading techniques.
IMR powders also preform properly for me with a person notable exception. Many of the chrongraphing I've carried out with them signifies the velecity is consistant higher than 32 levels but starts to range as soon as the temp begins to drop. The closer to zero I get the greater they vary. I've witnessed approximately 250 fps in a 10 shot string with my 243 and 223 in the Winter season time about here. Have not viewed this with many of the other powders.
It truly is most likely that no even further discussion is needed, during which case we advocate commencing a different thread. If even so you're feeling your reaction is required you can still do this.
Nampa, Idaho In my practical experience the only real real h4831sc distinction would be that the shortcut meters greater as a result of reloading devices. After it's loaded theres no functional big difference. I have read the shortcut could possibly have a very small bit more rapidly burn up rate but it seems insignificant.
Like stated previously mentioned, similar things. Everything differs is the size of the kernels. I did hear someplace that they are going to only make the SC Sooner or later. I don't know if that may be legitimate or not but would sound right to me. I exploit SC mainly because that is certainly what I located in the eight lb jug and it really works.
dioni.a.312 reported: In my working experience the sole serious change is that the shortcut meters much better as a result of reloading devices. After It really is loaded theres no h4831sc useful change. I have read that the shortcut might have a tiny bit more rapidly burn charge but It appears insignificant. Click on to extend...
Liberalism; The unachievable nonetheless acknowledged notion that it is fully possible to choose up a turd by the thoroughly clean conclusion.
As for the 4831 vs 4831SC, They are really the same/similar powder h4831sc load data cept for grain dimension. Load data is interchangeable.
Like Every person mentioned, the SC stands for “shorter Reduce” and is a bit much easier to meter. Tends to make you issue why they might nonetheless make the typical 1.
I frequently constantly obtain the sc Model. Employing a powder evaluate it hangs up fewer because of shorter kernels and I believe enables much more regular metering so fewer time you take trickling in the final bit of charge to create weight. So basically the SC saves you times
If I have a pound or two of a powder and get extra of exactly the same, only a distinct lot quantity, I will mix them all up to make sure that I've a homogeneous batch of powder with which to work.